The game of blackjack, also known as “21,” has greatly increased in popularity in recent years. This is most likely due to the apparent simplicity of the game. I say apparent because even though the object of the game is easily understood, the complexities are widely overlooked รูเล็ตออนไลน์.
If you ask a blackjack player what the object of the game is, they will most likely tell you it is to draw a card total as close to 21 as possible. This is a widely held belief, but it is incorrect. The sole object of the game is to beat the dealer.
To win, the player must either have a higher value hand than the dealer or have a valid hand under 21 when the dealer exceeds that target. Exceeding the total of 21 by either the player or dealer is referred to as “busting.”
Blackjack had always been a fabulous profit producer for the casinos and was always considered to have a huge house edge prior to the mid 1960’s. It was at this time Dr. Edward O. Thorp wrote his groundbreaking book “Beat The Dealer.”
Dr. Thorp’s book offered the first explanation of card counting techniques and how by tracking the depleted cards would give the player an advantage over the dealer.
Prior to this time no one had any idea that altering the composition of the deck would actually shift the advantage between the dealer and player depending on the cards that were dealt.
More importantly, those same computer trials produced a “basic strategy” for playing the individual hands based on the dealer’s exposed card. Despite all that has been written on the subject, the correct strategy for properly playing their hands is actually known by very few players.
Though most blackjack authorities claim that their strategies are based on either computer trials, mathematical calculations or a combination of the two, I have found that their resulting strategies are in no way consistent.
Thorp’s rules of play were also based on the use of a single deck of cards. At the time it was written all blackjack games were played with a single deck. Following the publication of his book, the nervous casinos fearing a loss of profits, countered by changing to an eight deck game dealt from a long, rectangular, plastic card holder called a “shoe.”